Comments on 'Loose Change 2nd Edition (Full)'

Back

Next

jay123jd (December 2nd, 2008 @ 1:29 am)
Tard cannot see the forest for the trees.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 8:16 pm)
Watch as the truther censor marks down posts that disagree with his insane theories. So much for free speech, when truthers are around. He is desperately trying to mark these posts as spam, in order to have posters who disagree with him removed by youtube. Its an admission of defeat, the truth movement dont like their theories questioned.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 7:37 pm)
flight77(dot)info has a list of the videos, only one shows the actual impact.
jesperdepesper (November 30th, 2008 @ 7:22 pm)
where do the pictures of the explosion at the pentagon come from
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 4:34 pm)
"Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office." So you have a couple of months to get your evidence together. Are you doing that? What law firm are you using?
delicato024 (November 30th, 2008 @ 3:52 pm)
Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 3:51 pm)
"if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public?" Yes. But he hasnt been charged with murder and no evidence has been submitted to any prosecution either. Thats the whole point. When are you intending to do this?
bIZAROsPRMN11 (November 30th, 2008 @ 3:23 pm)
TruthersAreRetarded, "you will have no problem pointing out these lies ... when are you planning on bringing a case to court?" a fallacy: it does not necessarily follow that you would recognize a lie. if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public? failure of critical thinking = failure of justice system.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 10:33 am)
Personally I cant wait to see a troofer case go to court. It will be comedy gold. Maybe you could bring up your "no planes" evidence izzy. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30th, 2008 @ 10:31 am)
"The governments account of 911 is full of lies therefore it defines itself as guilty demeanor. That is admissable as evidence." Then you will have no problem pointing out these lies will you? Also, when are you planning on bringing a case to court? All I see is whining on youtube and dead troofer sites. Surely if you have some evidence about 9/11 being an inside job, then you would be taking this to court?
izzysykopth (November 30th, 2008 @ 6:34 am)
No its called plausible deniability and plenty can and has been done about that. Deduction: The governments account of 911 is full of lies therefore it defines itself as guilty demeanor. That is admissable as evidence.
ctcole77 (November 30th, 2008 @ 2:16 am)
TruthersAreRetarded say it aloud three times, then read a science book

Next

 

Gems and Jewelry Videos Copyright © 2008 All Rights Reserved.