Gems and Jewelry Videos

Comments on 'Lonnie Zamora Part 1'

Back

Next

jacktheripoff1888 (January 2nd, 2009 @ 12:11 am)

This was I believe the only Blue Book case with all 3 of Dr. Hynek's classifications in one report. A daylight UFO sighting, with physical remains left, and sightings of its occupants. Dr. Hynek filed it in Blue Book as "unexplained", the military was not happy about that. If there was an actual bonafide sighting of UFO entity's of the hundreds of reports over the decades, the smart money is on this event.

mixedtrail (December 17th, 2008 @ 6:50 pm)

I thank posters for not disrespecting Mr Zamora, as this is my Uncle,and he was and is an honorable man, he only reported what he saw and heard,as we also would have. "lyle32y" Thank You from myself and my family for your posting, as I lost my video when this first came out. .....Peace.....

jvflexx (November 10th, 2008 @ 7:18 pm)

i believe this guy & case.....

randomlaughingman (August 10th, 2008 @ 1:40 pm)

I think the two "white coverall" wearing people he saw are the same ones as from The Solway Firth photograph case of 1964 (May 23rd). That case is itself linked to a sighting during a launch in Australia of the 'Blue Streak' rocket, as two white-wearing figures were seen nearby - the 'Blue Streak' was manufactured near where the Solway photo was taken.

dahur1 (June 27th, 2008 @ 4:15 pm)

Of course, the military isn't going to talk about the testing of any craft. They just come up with lame excuses for what it was, which insults ones intelligence. It was the debunkers who said the lunar module was what officer Zamora saw. I would think officer Zamora, being so close to a military base, had to know the chances of aircraft being tested there. Yet what he saw impressed him as being something else.

gyromancy2 (June 26th, 2008 @ 6:32 pm)

I believe in UFO's...but I'm always surprised to see that this cases garners so much attention and praise. It doesn't seem like a UFO. Also, the government is not going to tell much about their test flights of experimental craft. Do you think they let the public know about aviation test flights at Area 51?? I don't think so

dahur1 (June 25th, 2008 @ 12:50 am)

I said it's incorrect that no military aircraft like this we're being tested. White Sands was testing a lunar module, which looked NOTHING like what officer Zamora described. The debunkers DID try to say that's what he saw. Nice attempt, but nobody fell for it. Especially officer Zamora.

dahur1 (June 24th, 2008 @ 4:25 pm)

" And this is so inconsistent with every other UFO report. Also, a military base near by was testing experimental craft like this." That is incorrect. No military aircraft could be attributed to this sighting. (pgs 273-275, "UFO's and the National security state" Richard M. Dolan) The debunkers would have used that then if they could have, and they didn't.

dahur1 (June 24th, 2008 @ 3:16 pm)

"1. UFO's are not known to produce big flames when they take off. 2. UFO's don't make big, loud sounds as the fly." Usually this true, however there is nothing in the UFO handbook that says UFO's are not allowed to have flames or make noise as they fly. This is an extremely believable case, that even Blue Book investigator Prof Hynek, wrote as a "real, physical event".

gyromancy2 (June 7th, 2008 @ 2:40 pm)

I'm extremely skeptical about this case. 1. UFO's are not known to produce big flames when they take off. This may be the only one 2. UFOs don't make big, loud sounds as they fly. 99.9% of close UFO sightings report a soft humming noise. This is what Zamora reported. And this is so inconsistent with every other UFO report. Also, a military base near by was testing experimental craft like this.

gyromancy2 (June 7th, 2008 @ 2:37 pm)

I'm extremely skeptical about this case. 1. UFO's are not known to produce big flames when they take off. 2. UFOs don't make big, loud sounds as they fly. This is what Zamora reported. And this is so inconsistent with every other UFO report. Also, a military base near by was testing experimental craft like this.

mycomind (May 12th, 2008 @ 5:34 pm)

This is a historic incident (and interview) that should be preserved forever! I would love to have a copy. Thank you for posting this episode.

Comments on 'Lonnie Zamora Part 1'

Comments on 'Lonnie Zamora Part 1'

Pages:

Tags: